Google began shipping a new EEA hotel and flight layout on September 8. Aggregators sit in an expanded unit with prices. Direct hotels sit in a second unit without live rates or date filters. The July 23 DMA order required equal ranking, not that split.
Google began shipping a redesigned search page for European Economic Area users on September 8. For hotel, flight, long-distance rail or bus, and product queries, Search Central now documents two units. An aggregator unit — OTAs, comparison sites, metasearch, directories — expands the top-ranked provider by default, with photos, prices, or ratings where the feed supplies them. A supplier unit for hotels and airlines appears only alongside that block. Reuters describes the carousel below as website, phone, and address, with live prices gone. Date filters and tags such as “budget” are stripped from the supplier side.
Nick Fox, Google’s senior vice-president of knowledge and information, told Reuters the company is making “significant changes to Search in Europe” to meet DMA requirements, and that those changes “degrade the user experience for Europeans — boosting online intermediaries at the expense of local businesses.” An unnamed official called it the largest quality drop in 29 years of Search. That is the dominant story: a fine, a deadline, a worse product.
The July 23 decision does not write that page.
The order was equal ranking, not a specified two-unit SERP
IP/26/1670 fined Google €460 million for self-preferencing on Search — part of an €890 million package with Play steering — and ordered it to “treat third-party services that feature on Google’s search results in a fair and non-discriminatory manner by reference to its own services.” The finding was that Google displayed its own shopping, hotel, transport, and sports results more prominently, “including at the top of the search results page or by using enhanced visuals and filters,” while similar third-party services did not. The DMA rule underneath is ranking: do not treat your own services more favourably than rivals’.
If the remedy required equal treatment, why did the shipped layout remove direct travel information and put aggregators in the rich slot rather than give hotels an equivalent presentation? The public Commission text does not require removal of live prices, an aggregator unit expanded by default, or a supplier unit that appears only when an aggregator unit does. It notes Google had already started testing presentation changes for shopping, hotels, and flights, called that “substantial progress,” and said it would monitor those tests. Dialogue on AI Overviews and AI Mode was still open. Compliance is due within 60 days of July 23 — the week of September 21 — or Google risks periodic penalty payments of up to 5 percent of worldwide turnover. Shipping on September 8 is early. It is also Google’s design, not a Commission wireframe.

Equalizing “by reference to its own services” can run two ways. Give Booking and a hotel the same enhanced visuals Google once reserved for itself. Or strip the extras so nothing looks like the old Google unit. The second path is the conservative product. If live prices on a Google-drawn supplier carousel still count as preferring Google’s presentation layer, taking them off reduces the chance DG COMP calls the next screenshot non-compliant. Putting prices inside the aggregator unit locates the useful query on the intermediary now being elevated. Search Central is explicit that suppliers need not send extra data beyond crawling, and that their unit does not show unless the aggregator unit does. That is not an inability to print a rate. It is a mismatch between the old product’s usefulness and the layout Google judged legally quieter.
Google told Reuters it tested the design with millions of European users who retyped queries. The method is not public. The 30 percent drop in free direct-booking traffic it cites describes earlier DMA changes, not this week’s rollout. No independent SERP study has yet measured a neutral equal-features alternative. Hospitality groups and aggregators have welcomed a less Google-centric page. That welcome does not convert Google’s layout into the text of IP/26/1670.
The clock still belongs to Brussels. Cloud and agents remain unmapped DMA boxes while Search is rebuilt under a dated order. Search-data sharing with chatbots is a 2027 calendar, not a live feed. Hotel distribution cost will show in country-filtered Search Console and OTA take-rates, not in Alphabet’s quality slogan. China’s efficiency story is a different constraint on the same platform stack.
What would kill the residual is a Commission letter that this two-unit, price-on-aggregator design is the required form, or an independent panel showing Google did not strip supplier features relative to equal treatment. Until one of those arrives, the September 8 page is a product Google chose under a fine and a 60-day clock — not the statute’s specified travel results.
Continue reading
Sources
Commission IP/26/1670 (23 July 2026) €460 million Search self-preferencing decision and 60-day clock; Google Search Central EEA aggregator and supplier unit documentation (8 Sept 2026); Nick Fox statement via Reuters; Skift and Search Engine Journal on the Sept. 8 rollout.